子机构
400-600-1123
logo
备考资讯 提分课程 答疑社区
登录
注册
题库解析   >   假设 题型   >  
本题由chris提供

Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada's

Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there. Modern analysis of the island's soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher‘s samples must have been inaccurate.


Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?



    A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.

    B. The two mining expeditions funded by I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island.

    C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those

    generally used in the sixteenth century.

    D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.

    E. Gold was not added to the samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.


登录申友雷哥GMAT,查看答案及解析

视频解析

暂无视频解析,点击获取更多视频内容

文字解析

答案:
E
F是个16世纪
英国探险家,从加拿大K岛拿回土壤样本检测金含量。因为测出金含量高,伊丽莎白一世资助了两个开矿队。两个开矿队都没有找到金子。K岛的土壤分析表明金含量低。因此用来测F样本金含量的方法不精确 假设题 A. K岛的金含量现在比16世纪低;削弱,方向反,排 B. 两个开矿队没有开采K岛的同一区域;无关,排 C. 用来测F样本的方法和16世纪其他方法不同;无关比较,排 D. F没有从其他岛上取样本来测金含量;其他岛,跳出范围,排 E. 在样本检测前金子没有被加入样本;取反即有金子加入样本,测出金含量高不能说明测量方法不精确,取反削弱结论,正确

GMAT会员

提交
OG视频
申友雷哥GMAT小助手

添加官方小助手微信
了解更多GMAT考试与咨询

100蜜糖购买当前课程

当前蜜糖数:颗 去获取

立即购买 取消购买

吉祥物小蜜蜂

关注公众号

公众号

扫码关注申友雷哥GMAT公众号

立即获取12GGMAT核心资料

微信咨询

申友在线咨询二维码图片

扫码添加申友雷哥GMAT官方助手

立即咨询GMAT网课面授课程

联系申友雷哥 全国免费咨询热线:400-600-1123

Copyright © 2021 All Right Reserved 申友雷哥教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-3 免责声明 互联网经营许可证编号:沪B2-20210282